Ma`rifat-e Adyan, Volume 11, Issue 3, No 43, Year 2025 , Pages 47-64

    An Analytical-Critical Study of Ezekiel Kaufman's Theory on the Morphology of Monotheism and Polytheism

    Article Type: 
    Research
    Writers:
    ✍️ Milad Azami Maram / PhD Student of Religion and Mysticism, University of Tehran / miladazamimaram@ut.ac.ir
    Mojtaba Zarvani / Associate Professor, Department of Religions, University of Tehran / zarvani@gmail.com
    Abstract: 
    The classical scholars of Pentateuch , and at the head of them Julius Wellhausen believed that a critical examination of Pentateuch documents indicated a religious development during which Yahweh monotheism eventually led to moral monotheism. According to Kaufman, the morphological analysis of the world's religions does not confirm the theory of religious progress, and shows two different religious forms (monotheism and polytheism). Monotheism, which began with the activities of Moses, also includes other religions (Christianity and Islam), the rest of the religions fall into the category of polytheism. According to his analysis, the Hebraic religion is essentially different from the religion of the ancient world, so it cannot be a logical development; especially because historical evidence does not support such a development. He believed that despite their elements of Polytheism, the religious world of the Hebrews was the result of their own ideas, and external elements did not play a fundamental and creative role in its religious culture. However, contrary to his claim, his theory is not consistent with historical evidence and the Bible, and has at least three main weaknesses: First, he mistakenly equates old Israel with historical Israel, second, he emphasizes differences in distinguishing the Hebraic worldview from that of their neighbors and ignores interactions, while comparative studies show the interaction of Hebrew intellectual and religious patterns with neighbors; Third, the theory of the absolute distinction of Israeli monotheism from ancient polytheism seems to reflect his theological concern.
    چکیده و کلیدواژه فارسی (Persian)
    Title :بررسی تحلیلی ـ انتقادی نظریۀ حزقیال کافمن دربارۀ ریخت‌شناسی توحید و شرک
    Abstract: 
    محققان کلاسیک اسفار خمسه، و در رأسشان یولیوس ولهاوزن، معتقد بودند که بررسی انتقادی اسناد اسفار خمسه بیانگر یک پیشرفت دینی است که طی آن، یک خدایی یهوه ای نهایتاً به توحید اخلاقی انجامید. به باور حزقیال کافمن، تحلیل ریخت شناختی ادیان جهان، نظریۀ پیشرفت دینی را تأیید نمی کند و دو ریخت متفاوت دینی (توحید و شرک) را نشان می دهد. توحید با فعالیت های حضرت موسی علیه السلام آغاز شد و دیگر ادیان منشعب از آن (مسیحیت و اسلام) را نیز شامل می شود؛ بقیۀ ادیان ذیل مقولۀ شرک جای می گیرند. مطابق تحلیل او، دین عبرانیان به لحاظ ساخت، با دین جهان باستان ذاتاً متفاوت است و به همین دلیل نمی تواند پیشرفت منطقی آن باشد؛ به ویژه اینکه شواهد تاریخی نیز چنین پیشرفتی را تأیید نمی کنند. به اعتقاد او، جهان دینی عبرانیان به رغم استفاده از مواد شرک، محصول خود بود و عناصر بیگانه نقشی اساسی و خلاق در فرهنگ دینی آن نداشت. با این حال، نظریۀ او برخلاف دعوی خودش، همه جا با شواهد تاریخی و کتاب مقدسی سازگار نیست. نظریۀ او دست کم سه ضعف اساسی دارد: نخست اینکه او به اشتباه اسرائیل عهد قدیم را با اسرائیل تاریخی یکسان می گیرد؛ دوم او در تفکیک جهان بینی عبرانیان از همسایگانشان بر تفاوت ها تأکید دارد و از تعامل ها چشم می پوشد؛ در حالی که مطالعات مقایسه ای نشان از تعامل الگوهای فکری و دینی عبرانیان با همسایگان دارد؛ سوم اینکه ظاهراً نظریۀ تمایز مطلق توحید اسرائیلی از شرک باستان، بازتاب دغدغۀ الهیاتی اوست.
    References: 
    • مک‌گراث، آلیستر، 1384، درسنامۀ الاهیات مسیحی: شاخصه‌ها، منابع و روش‌ها، ترجمه بهروز حدادی، قم، انتشارات ادیان و مذاهب.
    • دوستخواه، جلیل، 1391، اوستا: کهن‌ترین سرودهای ایرانیان، تهران، مروارید.
    • Brettler, Marc Zvi, 1995, The Creation of History in Ancient Israel, London and New York, Routledge.
    • Googan, Michael D., 2005, “Canaanite Religion: The Literature”, Encyclopedia of Religion, ed. Lindsay Jones, Vol. 3, New York, Thomson Gale.
    • Canaanite Religion: The Literature1390.
    • Cross, Frank Moore, 1997, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel, London, Harvard University Press.
    • Greenstein, Edward L., 1999, The God of Israel and the Gods of Canaan: How Different Were They, Proceedings of the World Congress of Jewish Studies 12, No. 1, p. 47–58.
    • Halpern, Baruch, 1987, “Brisker Pipes than Poetry: The Development of Israelite Monotheism”, Judaic Perspectives on Ancient Israel, Jacob Neusner, Baruch A. Levine & Ernest S. Frerichs, Oregon, Wipf & Stock Publishers.
    • James, William, 2002, The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University.
    • Jindo, Job Y., 2017, “Is Kaufmann Toledot a Jewish Project”, Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D. & Staubli, Thomas (ed.), Fribourg, Switzerland/ Göttingen, Germany, Academic Press/ Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
    • Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D. & Staubli, Thomas, 2017, Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, Fribourg, Switzerland/ Göttingen, Germany, Academic Press/ Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
    • Kaplan, Lawrence, 2017, “Kaufmann, Krochmal and the Anxiety of Influence”, Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D. & Staubli, Thomas (ed.), Fribourg, Switzerland/ Göttingen, Germany, Academic Press/ Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
    • Kaufmann, Yehezkel, 2017a, “A Concise Summary of the Work Golah ve-nekhar”, Thomas M. Krapf (trans.), Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D. & Staubli, Thomas (ed.), Fribourg, Switzerland/ Göttingen, Germany, Academic Press/ Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
    • Kaufmann, Yehezkel, 1951, “The Bible and Mythological Polytheism”, Moshe Greenberg (trans.), Journal of Biblical Literature 70, No. 3, p. 179-197.
    • Kaufmann, Yehezkel, 1956, “The Biblical Age”, Great Ages and Ideas of the Jewish People, Leo W. Schwarz (ed.), New York, Random House.
    • Kaufmann, Yehezkel, 2017b, “The General Character of Israelite Religion”, Lenny Levin (trans.), Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D. & Staubli, Thomas (ed.), Fribourg, Switzerland/ Göttingen, Germany, Academic Press/ Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
    • Kaufmann, Yehezkel, 1972, The Religion of Israel: From the Beginning to the Babylonian Exile, Moshe Greenburg (trans.), New York: Schocken Booke.
    • Knauf, Ernst Axel, 1991, “From History to Interpretation”, The Fabric of History: Text, Artifact and Israel’s Past, Diana Vikander Edelman (ed.), Sheffield, Sheffield Academic Press
    • Knohl, Israel, 2017, “The Rise, Deline, and Renewal of the Biblical Revolution”, Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D. & Staubli, Thomas (ed.), Fribourg, Switzerland/ Göttingen, Germany, Academic Press/ Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
    • Levenson, Jon Douglas, 1994, Creation and the persistence of evil: the Jewish drama of divine omnipotence, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
    • Scott, E. F., 1914, “Gnosticism”, Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, ed. James Hastings, Vol. 6, New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons.
    • Smith, Morton, 1952, “The Common Theology of the Ancient near East”, Journal of Biblical Literature 71, No 3, p. 135-147.
    • Sommer, Benjamin D., 2011, “Dating Pentateuchal Texts and the Perils of Pseudo-Historicism”, The Pentateuch: International Perspectives on Current Research, Thomas B. Dozeman, Konrad Schmid & Baruch J. Schwartz (ed.), Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.
    • Sommer, Benjamin D., 2017, “Yehezkel Kaufmann and Recent Scholarship: Toward a Richer Discourse of Monotheism”, Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D. & Staubli, Thomas (ed.), Fribourg, Switzerland/ Göttingen, Germany, Academic Press/ Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
    • Staubli, Thomas, 2017, “Yehezkel Kaufmann: The Bern Years of a Genius”, Yehezkel Kaufmann and the Reinvention of Jewish Biblical Scholarship, Jindo, Job Y., Sommer, Benjamin D. & Staubli, Thomas (ed.), Fribourg, Switzerland/ Göttingen, Germany, Academic Press/ Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
    • Uffenheimer, Benjamin, 1986, “Myth and Reality in Ancient Israel”, The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations, S. N. Eisenstadt (ed.), New York, State University of New York
    • Wellhausen, Julius, 1961, Prolegomena To The History Of Ancient Israel, Mr. Menzies & Mr. Black (trans.), Cleveland & New York, The World Publishing Company.
    • Yirmiyahu, Yovel, 2009, The Other Within ـ the Marranos: Split Identity and Emerging Modernity, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
    • Zevit, Ziony, 2001, The Religion of Ancient Israel: A Synthesis of Parallactic Approaches, New York, Continuum.
    Cite this article: RIS Mendeley BibTeX APA MLA HARVARD VANCOUVER

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Azami Maram , Milad, Zarvani , Mojtaba.(2025) An Analytical-Critical Study of Ezekiel Kaufman's Theory on the Morphology of Monotheism and Polytheism. Ma`rifat-e Adyan, 11(3), 47-64

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Milad Azami Maram ; Mojtaba Zarvani ."An Analytical-Critical Study of Ezekiel Kaufman's Theory on the Morphology of Monotheism and Polytheism". Ma`rifat-e Adyan, 11, 3, 2025, 47-64

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Azami Maram , M, Zarvani , M.(2025) 'An Analytical-Critical Study of Ezekiel Kaufman's Theory on the Morphology of Monotheism and Polytheism', Ma`rifat-e Adyan, 11(3), pp. 47-64

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Azami Maram , M, Zarvani , M. An Analytical-Critical Study of Ezekiel Kaufman's Theory on the Morphology of Monotheism and Polytheism. Ma`rifat-e Adyan, 2025; 11(3): 47-64